olivia was white house spokesperson. but she left the white house trying to end the affair with president fitzgerald grant iii that began when he was campaigning for the white house. his campaign was losing bad. so cyrus brought her in. she had been a stand out student for cyrus years before. cyrus is now white house chief of staff.
it became obvious that fitz was going to lose and lose because of 1 state: ohio. just 1 county could turn it around. mellie (the 1st lady), cyrus and verna all pressured olivia to let wealth donor hollis fix the election. olivia said no. then finally agreed.
that conspiracy to steal the election (they did steal it) still has effects on events.
cyrus is now with his husband james. james is a reporter. james was getting too close to the truth (cyrus doesn’t know it but james got to the truth, he went to the county in ohio that was fixed and got the cartridge out of the voting machine). so it was time to kill him. but cyrus loves james and couldn’t let him be killed. so he got a baby and james quit reporting to watch the baby. (he’s the 1 staying home.)
remember how fitz was shot and last episode was all about hollis getting arrested for hiring becky (huck’s girlfriend) to kill the president? but then they let him go because he hadn’t? and cyrus was ‘handling’ it and huck explained to olivia that meant cyrus had hired a killer to kill hollis?
well last night was another big shocker. another omg.
it was a great episode.
verna got to be supreme court justice after the election. remember? fitz promised her he’d name her to that post if he got elected.
so that’s what she got out of stealing the election.
so olivia goes to see verna because there are problems. like i said last week, i was surprised no 1 was realizing fitz could still be in danger since hollis wasn’t the 1 who hired the assassin.
remember, the reason they thought it was hollis was because verna saw him with a burner phone he kept locked in his desk. so they thought that was how he hired and communicated with the assassin. but that wasn’t it. some 1 else hired becky. who?
olivia confronts verna. olivia put it togerther based on verna’s comment about the burner phone – since verna was the 1 pointing the finger at hollis.
verna did it. she hired the assassin.
olivia knows why too. she did it to protect her own legacy. if fitz dies in office, verna – who’s dying from cancer – gets to have a solid image as opposed to if verna or some 1 else reveals the conspiracy. then verna’s just a crook.
olivia can’t believe verna did it. she knows she did but that she would try to kill the president?
olivia’s been asked by fitz to wait. he’s going to divorce mellie.
olivia points out that mellie just gave birth (end of last episode). yes, and she was 4 weeks early, fitz says so he knew she had the labor induced and did so to try to keep him from divorcing her like he told her he was going to.
just time, he just needs a little bit more time.
olivia tells him the senate majority leader has proposed to her.
don’t you hate it when you’re in love with the president and you can’t decide whether he should leave his wife and whether you should leave your lover the senate majority leader?
so fitz tells cyrus this is happening. he will leave mellie.
he says he doesn’t care what it costs.
and meanwhile cyrus learns what james has done. why? james got a summons from a grand jury. david rosen is going forward with charges about the conspiracy to steal the election.
cyrus can’t believe james got as far as he did. but before they can really talk, he makes james strip because he wants to know james isn’t wearing a wire. james can’t believe that and makes cyrus strip as well.
of course neither has a wire. what are they going to do? james says he’ll have to testify.
cyrus says they’ll get a lawyer and they’ll argue that the husband-wife rule on not having to testify against each other should apply to 2 husbands as well.
james points out that he will not be allowed to go into the grand jury hearing with an attorney.
what to do?
meanwhile olivia’s trying to save fitz from the scandal. she needs that cartridge. abby still reeling from finding out that harrison and olivia plotted the break up with david goes ahead and agrees to get it from him. he’s got a safe in a bedroom closet. no 1 else will be able to. they agree reluctantly.
so she spends the night and wishes him well as he heads off to court.
somewhere around here, fitz goes to visit verna in the hospital and she dies.
james is headed towards the court house. the assassin cyrus always uses is following james and he is on the phone ,,, wutg ctrys!
maybe he won’t go in, says cyrus. he’s going in, says the assassin. they argue ov er that until the assassin says this is the last chance to get a shot. just as he’s about to shoot james, cyrus screams for him to stop and he pulls back.
cyrus was very close to letting james die. that was reallyl disturbing. he loves james, as we all know.
at the grand jury, james plays dumb. he says david came to him with the rumors of the conspiracy. because of his job – he tells the grand jury he was a reporter before he just adopted a baby – he thought that could be interesting and he looked into it. but there was nothing there. and he told david that.
david screamed that james was lying. but david was sounding crazy – which james probably knew would happen – and his boss told him to sit down.
so that’s that. as james had told cyrus, he’d handle it.
but the cartridge? as soon as david finds out it’s gone, he heads to olivia’s offices where abby has just arrived. he insists abby stole it. she says she didn’t. he grabs her purse and starts going through it as huck and harrison try to take it away from him but she says it’s fine. she didn’t take it.
she tells him she loves him.
he tells her that they’re through. he’s lost his job because of this and the only thing that would have saved him was that cartridge to prove
after he storms off, olivia and the others tell abby it’s too bad about the cartridge and that right now they need to figure out who has it.
abby does. she pulls it out of her bra. she lied to david.
so now there’s no proof. this is all over. at last.
verna told fitz.
he went to visit her. before she died, she told him she was the 1 who hired the assassin. he thought it was a joke. she was serious. she’d take her oxygen mask off and speak, put it back on. and slowly she told fitz the story about how it happened. kind of. she appears to have forgotten to mention mellie was involved.
so she explains to fitz he’s really not the president.
and she’s going to make it right. she’s going to give a statement to david rosen.
fitz holds her right hand. then he also holds her left hand. then he holds them together. with 1 hand. as he removes her oxygen mask. she struggles but she’s no match.
fitz killed her.
at the funeral, before fitz speaks, olivia goes up to him. he’s cold to her. she tells him she gave back the ring to the senator.
he doesn’t care.
he’s not leaving millie.
this is when he lets olivia know that verna told him about what they did.
quinn’s boyfriend was killed by hollis, remember? and she was framed for it. and that’s why olivia had huck rescue (kidnap) her and gave her a new name, tec. well now that hollis is out free, she manages to get $5000. she tells huck she knows its not enough but she wants him to kill hollis.
huck tells her he’ll do it but if he does so, quinn’s no longer a member of the team.
at the white house, fitz tells mellie she’s the only 1 he can trust. he thought she was the 1 who hired the assassin. (because before he was shot, they were in the limo and she begged him not to get out). he tells her the divorce is off.
so this really was an omg episode all the way throughout.
let’s close with c.i.’s ‘Iraq snapshot:’
Friday, February 8, 2013. Chaos and violence continue, protests continue in Iraq, protesters call for an end to tyranny, bombings are condemned, War Criminal Colin Powell remains in focus, and more.
All week long we’ve been noting the 10th anniversary of War Criminal Colin Powell presenting lies to the United Nation (February 5, 2003) to justify the war on Iraq. Simon Black (Sovereign Man) remembers he was stationed in Kuwait when Powell lied:
It all came crashing down ten years ago today. On February 5, 2003 Colin Powell, four-star general turned US Secretary of State, made a case to the United Nations that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
Now, I won’t bother delving into the inaccuracies of the intelligence he presented. In Powell’s own words, making that presentation to the UN was “the lowest point in [his] life” and a “lasting blot on his record.”
For me, it was pivotal. At that instant, I knew without doubt that my government had reprehensibly lied through its teeth. And if they were lying about this… what else were they lying about?
Everything, it turned out.
Norman Solomon has been addressing Powell’s lies all week (including this column). He is a guest on FAIR’s CounterSpin which began airing today.
Norman Solomon: I would contend that Powell’s speech at the UN was perhaps the most mendacious speech by a UN diplomat in the last several decades. And its power was only manifested because, with very few exceptions, the corporate US mass media fell all over themselves to praise it as a brilliant tour de force
Janine Jackson: Well a couple of days ago, you debated the man who prepared that UN speech, Colin Powell’s former aid Lawrence Wilkerson, on Democracy Now! and it was fascinating. Even now — Wilkerson has, I know, renounced or walked back his feelings on that speech — but even now, he still insists, you know, that it’s terribly lamentable but we were all wrong. And when you said, ‘No, everyone wasn’t wrong. You know, the Institute for Public Accuracy, Scott Ritter, other folks including FAIR weren’t wrong,” Wilkerson’s argument in his defense was to say, “When I said ‘we,’ I meant those in government — not people like him” — meaning you — “or Scott Ritter or anybody else who were protesting that Iraq didn’t have WMD at the time.” That sounds to me like he’s saying only people in government have standing to think about policy or be heard on policy.
Norman Solomon: The reality was that not only did the Bush administration and many of their go-to-war allies among Democrats in Congress ignore the information and critique from Scott Ritter and Hans von Sponeck and other UN weapons inspectors as well as many independent progressive media outlets and protesters in the United States. And they trashed us to be honest and cast all sorts of aspersions and said that we were ignorant and disloyal and all the rest of it. So when, ten years later, we have the Chief of Staff for Colin Powell during the lead up to the war and when it was going on now telling me on live national television on Democracy Now! that I had failed to call him and inform him that there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq? I mean, I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry. It’s just I felt that I had been pulled down Alice In Wonderland’s rabbit hole.
Janine Jackson: Yes, exactly. He wouldn’t have listened to you and yet somehow you were meant to alert him to the realities of the — of the holes in that evidence. It was a kind of bizarre line of argument. And it seems as though there’s really no sanction. Not only has being right about Iraq’s lack of WMDs not encouraged journalists to grant legitimacy to those groups that were right — they’ve stayed on the margins — there really also seems to be no sanction in journalism for being so wrong about something that was so devastating and so horrific. And we see that because the same way of approaching official claims seems to be in place, intact.
Francis A. Boyle: These were all lies. Everyone knew it at the time. Powell knew it. Right now, Powell is just shedding some imperial crocodile tears over his report. Powell aided and abetted a Nuremberg crime against against peace, against Iraq, for which we unanimously convicted [former Supreme Court appointee to the US Oval Office Bully Boy] Bush and [former UK Prime Minister Tony] Blair at the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal. The two of them are international criminals — Bush, Blair and I would say Powell too for aiding and abetting. And they should be apprehended and prosecuted by any state that gets a hold of the three of them.
Michael Welch: Yes. And it’s interesting because the major media, they held at the time, Mr. Powell — and I suppose continue to hold these individuals in high reverence and seem to be just allowing that meme of “well it was just a mistake” to continue. So is there —
Francis A. Boyle: Well this is a joke too. This is a joke too in that it’s well known that when he was a Major in Vietnam in the army, Powell helped cover up the My Lai Massacre. So there’s nothing, I mean this guy was a bootlicker from the beginning — which is how he got his position. I think he wanted to work for Al Hague and then bootlicked his way up the bureaucracy there. So he’s been a sycophant and a boot licker and now a War Criminal.
Iraq has been slammed today with multiple car bombings resulting in what Sinan Salaheddin (AP) calls “the bloodiest day in more than two months” while Duraid Adnan (New York Times) emphasizes that Iraq has “witnessed bombings now on seven consecutive Fridays.” CBS and AP count at least 30 dead. BBC News notes over 80 injured, two bombings in Baghdad and two in Hilla. Press TV explains of the Baghdad assualt, “Iraqi security and medical sources reported that bombings targeted a crowded bird market in the Kadhimiyah neighborhood of the capital, Baghdad, just after 9:00 a.m. local time (0600 GMT) on Friday.” In another filing, Press TV notes, “Security sources say the first bomb exploded at the main entrance to the market, and as panicked crowds tried to flee the area, the second device went off. ” On the Baghdad assault, AFP reports, “Glass and shrapnel was scattered across the scene, an AFP journalist said, while pools of blood had formed on the ground and a chain-link fence was badly mangled. Several nearby cars were completely destroyed, and while passers-by scanned the wreckage, security forces tried to bar journalists from interviewing people in the area or taking pictures or videos.” Before they were stopped from filming, AFP’s Ali al-Saadi and Khalil al-Murshidi filmed this video of the aftermath. Mohammed Tawfeeq (CNN) explains, “That type of market tends to be very busy on Fridays, part of the weekend in Iraq, and have been targeted in the past by attackers.” Hou Qiang (Xinhua) notes, “An official with the local police station told Xinhua on condition of anonymity that the area is a Shiite Muslim community and has seen many attacks launched by the Sunni insurgents.”
Turning to the Hilla assault, RTE notes, “A further 13 people were killed in two car bomb explosions at a vegetable market in the Shia city of Hilla, 100km south of Baghdad.” Kareem Raheem, Ali al-Rubaie, Suadad al-Salhy, Isabel Coles and Jon Hemming (Reuters) quote eye witness Habib al-Murshidi stating, “I was shopping when I heard the first explosion. I was scared and tried to reach my car to run away but before I got in the second explosion went off. I saw many people, women and old men lying on the ground which was covered with blood and scattered fruit and vegetables.” All Iraq News reports of the two car bombs that one car was paked in a garage and the other near the market
Al Jazeera, the Christian Science Monitor and PRI’s Jane Arraf Tweets on another bombing:
Of the Karbala bombing, Alsumaria notes it took place at noon local time and also damaged cars and buildings.
The United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq issued the following:
Baghdad, 8 February 2013 – Following the series of bombings that today hit popular and crowded places in Baghdad’s Khadimiya neighbourhood and in Shomali in Babel province, killing and injuring dozens of innocent victims, the Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for Iraq (SRSG) Martin Kobler said that “perpetrators of these heinous and horrible acts are ruthless criminals whose sole goal is to push the country back to sectarian violence”.
The SRSG appealed to the Iraqi leaders to unite and work together in order to stop once and for all the language of violence from spreading. “It is their duty and responsibility to sit together to see what can be put in place to stop this heinous, horrible violence,” he added. “It is the duty of the Iraqi leaders to find a solution to the current political stalemate in the country.”
Ken Hanly (Digital Journal) quotes Omar al-Faruq stating, “I have been here for 45 days waiting for my dream to become a reality. I dream that Maliki will be tried, the same way as Saddam.” He was protesting in Ramadi and he is only one of the many protesters taking to the streets of late. Iraqi Spring shares photos of the Ramadi protest.
Alsumaria notes that Anbar Province demonstrators have condemned the bombing and are calling for the government to implement their demands or resign. Al-Shorfa adds that the spokesperson for the Mosul protesters, Ghanem al-Abd, also condemned the attacks. World Bulletin explains, “Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, is facing mass protests by disenchanted Sunni Muslims and is at loggerheads with ethnic Kurds who run their northern region autonomously from Baghdad.” For the seventh week, protests continue in Iraq with today being dubbed “NO to the Tyrannical Ruler.” Morning Star quotes Samarra’s Sheik Mohammed Jumaa declaring, “Stop tyranny and oppression. We want our rights. You will witness what other tyrants have witnessed before you.” Kitabat reports protests today in Anbar, Mosul, Salahuddin, Kirkuk, Diyala and Baghdad and that protesters are calling Nouri the Pharaoh of Iraq (it’s not a compliment) and noting that his State of Law didn’t win the 2010 parliamentary elections but he used the Erbil Agreement to grab the post of prime minister then disregarded the partnership agreement. Najaf demonstrators called this morning for Article IV of the Constitution to be gutted (‘terrorists’ arrests — if you can’t find your suspect, arrest a relative). Alsumaria notes “hundreds” demonstrating in Kirkuk and demanding that Nouri’s government resign if they are unable to meet the demands of the protesters. Sinan Salaheddin (AP) notes protesters in Falluja and Ramadi again “blocked the main highway to Jordan.” On the Ramadi protests, Omar al-Shaher (Al-Monitor) reports:
Amid the clamor caused by the ongoing protests in Anbar province in western Iraq, which are nearing their 50th day, demonstrators have pitched huge tents and blocked traffic on the highway linking Iraq to Jordan and Syria. The protest organizers said that the main square was attracting a million people each Friday, including many participants from thousands of miles away, who require food and a place to sleep. On one such Friday, 200 sheep were slaughtered to provide demonstrators with food. On another Friday, the city of Hit, located 50 miles west of Ramadi, served demonstrators 2,000 dishes of meat and rice for lunch. The demonstration’s organizers said that Friday lunch meals can cost upwards of $60,000.
Qusay Zain, a spokesman for the protest, said that tribal leaders in Ramadi compete to serve lunch to protesters, despite the exorbitant costs. “This time, many tribal leaders in Anbar have taken honorable stances,” he said.
Liz Sly (Washington Post) observes, “With their huge turnouts, these largely peaceful demonstrations have the potential to present a far bigger challenge to Maliki’s hold on power than the violent and still stubbornly persistent insurgency, which continues to claim scores of lives every month without any discernible impact on the political process.” NeoconservativesKimberly and Frederick W. Kagan have written an opinion piece on the protests for theWashington Post:
Eighteen days of protests in Egypt in 2011 electrified the world. But more than twice that many days of protest in Iraq have gone almost unnoticed in the United States. Iraqi army troops killed five Sunni protesters in Fallujah on Jan. 25, after a month of anti-government protests in Anbar, Nineveh and Salahuddin provinces and elsewhere for which thousands turned out. Al-Qaeda in Iraq and Iranian-backed Shiite militias are re-mobilizing. Iraq teeters on the brink of renewed insurgency and, potentially, civil war.
This crisis matters for America. U.S. vital interests that have been undermined over the past year include preventing Iraq from becoming a haven for al-Qaeda and destabilizing the region by becoming a security vacuum or a dictatorship that inflames sectarian civil war; containing Iranian influence in the region; and ensuring the free flow of oil to the global market.
While tensions have risen over the past two years, the triggers for recent eruptions are clear. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite, had the bodyguards of Finance Minister Rafie al-Issawi, who is Sunni, arrested for alleged terrorist activities on Dec. 20 — almost exactly one year after he ordered the arrest of Sunni Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi’ssecurity detail. Hashimi fled to Turkey and is unlikely to return soon to Iraq, where he was sentenced to death after Maliki demanded his trial in absentia for murder and financing terrorism.
The threat to Issawi, a moderate technocrat from Anbar, galvanized Iraqi Sunnis, who rightly saw Maliki’s move as sectarian and an assault on government participation by Sunnis not under the prime minister’s thumb. Three days after the arrests, demonstrations broke out in Ramadi, Fallujah and Samarra. Three days after that, a large protest closed the highwayfrom Baghdad to Syria and Jordan. The popular resistance spread to Mosul on Dec. 27.
Meanwhile Iraqi President Jalal Talabani remains out of the country. Late on December 17th (see the December 18th snapshot), Jalal Talabani had a stroke and was admitted to Baghdad’s Medical Center Hospital. Thursday, December 20th, he was moved to Germany. He remains in Germany currently. [Saad Abedine (CNN) reported talk that it was a stroke the day the news broke (December 18th) and January 9th, the Office of President Talabani confirmed it had been a stroke.] The January 30th snapshot noted that Kurdistan Regional Government President Massoud Barzani visited Talabani in the Germany — Barzani was enroute to Davos — with Barzani stating that Jalal’s health was improving. Talabani’s website explains the the United Nations Secretary-General’s Special Envoy to Iraq, Martin Kobler, conveyed congratulations on Tuesday, noting Jalal’s progress and that his health had stabilized.
Turning to the United States, yesterday saw John Brennnen appear before the Senate Intelligence Committee in his pursuit of the post to be Director of the CIA. It was covered in “Iraq snapshot,” “Thoughts on today’s Senate Intell hearing (C.I.),” Ava‘s “The disgraceful Dianne Feinstein (Ava),” Wally‘s “Brennan likes torture (Wally)” AND Kat‘s “Brennan tries to weasel.” On that hearing, Jon Schwarz Tweets:
In addition, Ruth reported on a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing in “If Leon Panetta told the truth . . ..” And, still on the Senate, Senator Patty Murray’s office notes the following on veterans’ spouses:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, February 8th, 2013
CONTACT: Murray Press Office
Murray Discusses Challenges for Military Spouses at Symposium in Tacoma
(Washington, D.C.) — Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) discussed employment challenges and opportunities for military spouses at the 2013 Military Officers Association of America’s Military Spouse Symposium in Tacoma. The event, titled “Keeping a Career on the Move,” brought service members, veterans, and military spouses together with local business experts and employers. Senator Murray’s remarks focused on the challenges that military spouses face to support their loved ones and her personal experiences from growing up in a military family. As the former Chair of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, Senator Murray is a leader in Washington on issues to service members, veterans and their families.
The full text of Senator Murray’s speech follows:
the associated press
all iraq news
the new york times
francis a. boyle
the washington post